Utilization of immediate extubation in a multidisciplinary pathway for pediatric liver transplantation associated with improved postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Immediate extubation is becoming more common in liver transplantation. However, limited data exist on how to identify pediatric patients with potential for successful immediate extubation and how this intervention may affect recovery. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2015 to 2021 at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. Preoperative status and intraoperative management were evaluated and compared. Outcomes comprised thrombosis, surgical reexploration, retransplantation, as well as reintubation, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) usage, postoperative infection, the length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were analyzed, with 121 patients (69.9%) extubated immediately. The extubation group had older age (median 4.0 vs 1.25 years, p = .048), lower PELD/MELD (28 vs. 34, p = .03), decreased transfusion (10.2 vs. 41.7 mL/kg, p < .001), shorter surgical time (332 vs. 392 min, p < .001), and primary abdominal closure (81% vs. 40.4%, p < .001). Immediate extubation was associated with decreased HFNC (0.21 vs. 0.71 days, p = .02), postoperative infection (9.9% vs. 26.9%, p = .007), mortality (0% vs. 5.8%, p = .036), and pediatric intensive care unit LOS (4.7 vs. 11.4 days, p < .001). The complication rate was lower in the extubation group (24.8% vs. 36.5%), but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 70% of patients were able to be successfully extubated immediately, with only 2.5% requiring reintubation. Those immediately extubated had decreased need for HFNC, lower infection rates, shorter LOS, and decreased mortality. Our results show that with proper patient selection and a multidisciplinary approach, immediate extubation allows for improved recovery without increased respiratory complications after pediatric liver transplantation.

Pressure Support Ventilation Versus T-piece as Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Extubation of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Weaning patients with COPD from mechanical ventilation (MV) presents a challenge, as literature on this topic is limited. This study compares PSV and T-piece during spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in this specific population. METHODS: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane in September 2023 yielded four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 560 patients. Among these, 287 (51%) used T-piece during SBTs. RESULTS: The PSV group demonstrated a significant improvement in the successful extubation rate compared to the T-piece (risk ratio [RR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.26; p = 0.02). Otherwise, there was no statistically significant difference in the reintubation (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.79-1.45; p = 0.67) or the ICU mortality rates (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.63-1.55; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Although PSV in SBTs exhibits superior extubation success, consistent weaning protocols warrant further exploration through additional studies.

Assessment of pre-extubating recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy using ultrasound in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound performed after extubation has been suggested to be useful for the diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis. However, the use of ultrasound for this purpose before extubation has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine the versatility (interrater reliability) and usefulness of ultrasound for evaluating the movement of vocal cords before extubation. METHODS: The subjects were 30 patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer from August 2020 to December 2021. An experienced examiner performed an ultrasound examination before and after elective extubation on the day after surgery to evaluate RLN paralysis and record videos. Bronchoscopy was then performed to make a definite diagnosis. Three anesthetists blinded to the diagnosis also evaluated the cases using the videos, and the versatility of the examination was determined using a kappa test. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of the examiner and three anesthetists were 76.7%, 50.0%, 53.3%, and 46.7%, respectively, and the kappa coefficients for the examiner with the anesthetists were 0.310, 0.502, and 0.169, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of RLN paralysis by the examiner using ultrasound before extubation were 0.57, 0.95, 0.80, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a lack of versatility of the ultrasound examination based on the low kappa coefficients. However, with an experienced examiner, ultrasound can serve as a non-invasive examination that can be performed before extubation with high accuracy and specificity for diagnosis of postoperative RLN paralysis.

Diaphragm atrophy during invasive mechanical ventilation is related to extubation failure in preterm infants: An ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD), including diaphragm atrophy (DA), is poorly studied in newborns. We aimed to assess VIDD and its associations in newborns. METHODS: Single-center prospective study. Diaphragm thickness was measured at end-inspiration (TDI) and end-expiration (TDE) on the right midaxillary line. DA was defined as decrease in TDE ≥ 10%. Daily measurements were recorded in preterm newborns on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ≥2 days. Clinical characteristics of patients and extubation failure were recorded. Univariate analysis, logistic regression, and mixed models were performed to describe VIDD and associated factors. RESULTS: We studied 17 patients (median gestational age 270/7 weeks) and 22 IMV cycles (median duration 9 days). Median TDE decreased from 0.118 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 0.094-0.165) on the first IMV day to 0.104 cm (IQR 0.083-0.120) on the last IMV day (p = .092). DA occurred in 11 IMV cycles (50%) from 10 infants early during IMV (median: second IMV day). Mean airway pressure (MAP) and lung ultrasound score (LUS) on the first IMV day were significantly higher in patients who developed DA. DA was more frequent in patients with extubation failure than in those with extubation success within 7 days (83.3 vs. 33.3%, p = .038). CONCLUSIONS: DA, significantly associated with extubation failure, occurred in 58.8% of the study infants on IMV. Higher MAP and LUS at IMV start were associated with DA. Our results suggest a potential role of diaphragm ultrasound to assess DA and predict extubation failure in clinical practice.

Use of high-flow nasal cannula versus other noninvasive ventilation techniques or conventional oxygen therapy for respiratory support following pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive respiratory support may be provided to decrease the risk of postextubation failure following surgery. Despite these efforts, approximately 3%-27% of infants and children still experience respiratory failure after tracheal extubation following cardiac surgery. This systematic review evaluates studies comparing the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula to conventional oxygen therapy such as nasal cannula and other noninvasive ventilation techniques in preventing postextubation failure in this patient population. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted in major databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Central. The search encompassed articles focusing on the prophylactic use of high-flow nasal cannula following tracheal extubation in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. The inclusion criteria for this review consisted of randomized clinical trials as well as observational, cohort, and case-control studies. RESULTS: A total of 1295 studies were screened and 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. These 12 studies included a total of 1565 children, classified into three groups: seven studies compared high-flow nasal cannula to noninvasive ventilation techniques, four studies compared high-flow nasal cannula to conventional oxygen therapy, and one observational single-arm study explored the use of high-flow nasal cannula with no control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of tracheal reintubation between high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-1.90, p = .46). However, there was a lower incidence of tracheal reintubation in patients who were extubated to high-flow nasal cannula versus those extubated to noninvasive ventilation techniques (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.63, p < .01). The high-flow nasal cannula group also demonstrated a lower mortality rate compared to the noninvasive ventilation techniques group (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.61, p < .01) as well as a shorter postoperative length of stay (mean difference = -8.76 days, 95% CI: -13.08 to -4.45, p < .01) and shorter intensive care length of stay (mean difference = -4.63 days, 95% CI: -9.16 to -0.11, p = .04). CONCLUSION: High-flow nasal cannula is more effective in reducing the rate of postextubation failure compared to other forms of noninvasive ventilation techniques following surgery for congenital heart disease in pediatric-aged patients. high-flow nasal cannula is also associated with lower mortality rates and shorter length of stay. However, when comparing high-flow nasal cannula to conventional oxygen therapy, the findings were inconclusive primarily due to a limited number of scientific studies available on this specific comparison. Future study is needed to further define the benefit of high-flow nasal cannula compared to conventional oxygen therapy and various types of noninvasive ventilation techniques.

Outcomes of Unplanned Extubations in a Large Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned extubation (UE) is defined as unintentional dislodgement of an endotracheal tube (ETT) from the trachea. UEs can lead to instability, cardiac arrest, and may require emergent tracheal re-intubation. As part of our hospital-wide quality improvement (QI) work, a multidisciplinary committee reviewed all UEs to determine contributing factors and evaluation of clinical outcomes to develop QI interventions aimed to minimize UEs. The objective was to investigate occurrence, contributing factors, and clinical outcomes of UEs in the pediatric ICU (PICU), cardiac ICU (CICU), and neonatal ICU (NICU) in a large academic children's hospital. We hypothesized that these would be substantially different across 3 ICUs. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of UEs in the PICU, CICU, and NICU was recorded in a prospective database for the last 5 y. Consensus-based standardized operational definitions were developed to capture contributing factors and adverse events associated with UEs. Data were extracted through electronic medical records by 3 respiratory therapists and local Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS) database. Consistency of data extraction and classification were evaluated. RESULTS: From January 2016-December 2021, 408 UEs in 339 subjects were reported: PICU 52 (13%), CICU 31 (7%), and NICU 325 (80%). The median (interquartile range) of age and weight was 2.0 (0-4.0) months and 5.3 (3.0-8.0) kg. Many UE events were not witnessed (54%). Common contributing factors were routine nursing care (no. = 70, 18%), ETT retaping (no. = 62, 16%), and being held (no. = 15, 3.9%). The most common adverse events with UE were desaturation < 80% (33%) and bradycardia (22.8%). Cardiac arrest occurred in 12%. Sixty-seven percent of UEs resulted in re-intubation within 72 h. The proportion of re-intubation across 3 units was significantly different: PICU 62%, CICU 35%, NICU 71%, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: UEs occurred commonly in a large academic children's hospital. Whereas UE was associated with adverse events, re-intubation rates within 72 h were < 70% and variable across the units.

Routine Extubation in the Operating Room After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of fast-track extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery are well established. Although extubation in the operating room (OR) is safe in carefully selected patients, widespread use of this strategy in cardiac surgery remains unproven. This study was designed to evaluate perioperative outcomes with OR vs ICU extubation in patients undergoing nonemergency, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data for all single-center patients who underwent nonemergency isolated CABG over a 6-year interval were analyzed. Perioperative morbidity and mortality with ICU vs OR extubation were compared. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022, 1397 patients underwent nonemergency, isolated CABG; 891 (63.8%) of these patients were extubated in the ICU, and 506 (36.2%) were extubated in the OR. Propensity matching resulted in 414 pairs. In the propensity-matched cohort, there were no differences between the 2 groups in incidence of reintubation, reoperation for bleeding, total operative time, stroke or transient ischemic attack, renal failure, or 30-day mortality. OR-extubated patients had shorter ICU hours (14 hours vs 20 hours; P < .0001), shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (3 days vs 5 days; P < .0001), a greater likelihood of being discharged directly to home (97.3% vs 89.9%; P < .0001), and a lower 30-day readmission rate (1.7% vs 4.1%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Routine extubation in the OR is a feasible and safe strategy for a broad spectrum of patients after nonemergency CABG, with no increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality. Wider adoption of routine OR extubation for nonemergency CABG is indicated.

Association of post-operative ICU requirements with early extubation in the fontan procedure.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association between early extubation (EE) and the degree of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) support after the Fontan procedure, specifically evaluating the volume of postoperative intravenous fluid (IVF) and vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Fontan palliation from 2008 to 2018 at a single center was completed. Patients were initially divided into pre-institutional initiative towards EE (control) and post-initiative (modern) cohorts. Differences between the cohorts were assessed using t-test, Wilcoxon, or chi-Square. Following stratification by early or late extubation, four groups were compared via ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis Test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the rate of EE between the control and modern cohorts (mean 42.6 versus 75.7%, p = 0.01). The modern cohort demonstrated lower median VIS (5 versus 8, p = 0.002), but higher total mean IVF (101±42 versus 82 ±27 cc/kg, p < 0.001) versus control cohort. Late extubated (LE) patients in the modern cohort had the highest VIS and IVF requirements. This group received 67% more IVF (140 ± 53 versus 84 ± 26 cc/kg, p < 0.001) and had a higher median VIS at 24 hours (10 (IQR, 5-10) versus 4 (IQR, 2-7), p < 0.001) versus all other groups. In comparison, all EE patients had a 5-point lower median VIS when compared to LE patients (3 versus 8, p= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EE following the Fontan procedure is associated with reduced post-operative VIS. LE patients in the modern cohort received more IVF, potentially identifying a high-risk subgroup of Fontan patients deserving of further investigation.

Extubation in operating room versus early extubation in ICU after open-heart surgery in patients with CHDs.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: The "Fast track" protocol is an early extubation strategy to reduce ventilator-associated complications and induce early recovery after open-heart surgery. This study compared clinical outcomes between operating room extubation and ICU extubation after open-heart surgery in patients with CHD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 215 patients who underwent open-heart surgery for CHDs under the scheduled "Fast track" protocol between September 2016 and April 2022. The clinical endpoints were post-operative complications, including bleeding, respiratory and neurological complications, and hospital/ICU stays. RESULTS: The patients were divided into operating room extubation (group O, n = 124) and ICU extubation (group I, n=91) groups. The most frequently performed procedures were patch closures of the atrial septal (107/215, 49.8%) and ventricular septal (89/215, 41.4%) defects. There were no significant differences in major post-operative complications or ICU and hospital stay duration between the two groups; however, patients in group I showed longer mechanical ventilatory support (0.0 min vs. 59.0 min (interquartile range: 17.0-169.0), p < 0.001). Patients in Group O showed higher initial lactate levels (3.2 ± 1.7 mg/dL versus 2.5 ± 2.0 mg/dL, p = 0.007) and more frequently used additional sedatives and opioid analgesics (33.1% versus 19.8%, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Extubation in the operating room was not beneficial for patients during post-operative ICU or hospital stay. Early extubation in the ICU resulted in more stable hemodynamics in the immediate post-operative period and required less use of sedatives and analgesics.

Higher Cumulative Dose of Opioids and Other Sedatives are Associated with Extubation Failure in Norwood Patients.

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between sedation usage and extubation failure, and to control for the effects of hemodynamic, oximetric indices, clinical characteristics, ventilatory settings pre- and post-extubation, and echocardiographic (echo) findings in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) post-Norwood procedure. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective analysis of Norwood patients during their first extubation post-surgery from January 2015 to July 2021. Extubation failure was defined as reintubation within 48 h of extubation. Demographics, clinical characteristics, ventilatory settings, echo findings (right ventricular function, tricuspid regurgitation), and cumulative dose of sedation medications before extubation were compared between patients with successful or failed extubation. RESULTS: The analysis included 130 patients who underwent the Norwood procedure with 121 (93%) successful and 9 (7%) failed extubations. Univariate analyses showed that vocal cord anomaly (p = 0.05), lower end-tidal CO2 (p < 0.01), lower pulse-to-respiratory quotient (p = 0.02), and ketamine administration (p = 0.04) were associated with extubation failure. The use of opioids, benzodiazepines, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine are mutually correlated in this cohort. On multivariable analysis, the vocal cord anomaly (OR = 7.31, 95% CI 1.25-42.78, p = 0.027), pre-extubation end-tidal CO2 (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.97, p = 0.025), and higher cumulative dose of opioids (OR = 10.16, 95% CI 1.25-82.43, p = 0.030) were independently associated with extubation failure while also controlling for post-extubation respiratory support (CPAP/BiPAP/HFNC vs NC), intubation length, and echo results. CONCLUSION: Higher cumulative opioid doses were associated with a greater incidence of extubation failure in infants post-Norwood procedure. Therefore, patients with higher cumulative doses of opioids should be more closely evaluated for extubation readiness in this population. Low end-tidal CO2 and low pulse-to-respiratory quotient were also associated with failed extubation. Consideration of the pulse-to-respiratory quotient in the extubation readiness assessment can be beneficial in the Norwood population.

Criteria for immediate extubation after pediatric liver transplantation in a single pediatric liver transplant center in Japan.

Immediate extubation (IE) following liver transplantation (LT) has become the standard practice, even for pediatric patients. However, no preoperative or postoperative case selection protocols for IE are currently available. We have developed selection criteria for IE following pediatric LT. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of these selection criteria and anesthetic management protocol implemented in our hospital for IE after pediatric LT. METHOD: This was a retrospective study. The records of all cases undergoing LT in our center from January 2016 to December 2020 were collected. We excluded cases > 18 years old at the time of LT. Enrolled cases were divided into two groups: cases with immediate extubation (IE) or without immediate extubation (NIE). We compared preoperative conditions, intraoperative management, and postoperative courses. Finally, we classified NIE group patients into cases extubated at postoperative day 1 (early; E-NIE) and others (delayed; D-NIE) and compared their underlying diseases and postoperative courses. RESULTS: In the IE group, there were 81 cases, while the NIE group consisted of 185 cases. All patients in the IE group were successfully extubated without any instances of re-intubation due to respiratory failure. Within the E-NIE group, comprising 130 cases, all patients were ultimately extubated without the need for tracheostomy. However, in the D-NIE group, which encompassed 53 cases, seven patients required tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: In our center, the implementation of our anesthesia management protocol and the use of pre/postoperative case selection criteria have allowed for the safe practice of IE following pediatric LT. However, it should be noted that patients who cannot be extubated by Postoperative Day 1 (POD1) may be at an increased risk of requiring a tracheostomy. When contemplating IE, it is crucial to take into account the disease-specific physiological aspects and surgical site situations.

Pulmonary expansion manoeuvres compared to usual care on ventilatory mechanics, oxygenation, length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, extubation, atelectasis, and mortality of patients in mechanical ventilation: A randomized clinical trial.

Pulmonary expansion manoeuvres are therapeutic techniques used to prevent and reverse atelectasis; however, no randomized controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the use of this intervention among individuals on mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of chest compression-decompression and chest block manoeuvres compared to usual care among patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: The current study was a randomized clinical trial of adult subjects on mechanical ventilation for 12 to 48 hours. The control group received usual care (passive or active mobilization, manoeuvres for airway clearance and tracheal aspiration). The intervention group received usual care plus two lung expansion manoeuvres, i.e., chest decompression and chest block, while remaining on mechanical ventilation. Assessments were performed before and after usual care, immediately after the intervention and 30 minutes after the intervention. The primary outcome was static compliance. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of atelectasis, dynamic compliance, airway resistance, driving pressure, oxygenation, duration of mechanical ventilation, extubation success, length of hospital and ICU stay, and mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants (67±15 years old, 53% men, 26 in the control group and 25 in the intervention group) were evaluated. No differences in static compliance were observed between groups (intervention minus control) before and after expansion manoeuvres [3.64 ml/cmH2O (95% CI: -0.36-7.65, p = 0.074)]. Peripheral oxygen saturation differed between groups before and after expansion manoeuvres, with more favourable outcome observed in the control group [-1.04% (95% CI: -1.94 --0.14), p = 0.027]. No differences were found in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Chest compression-decompression and chest block manoeuvres did not improve ventilatory mechanics, the incidence of atelectasis, oxygenation, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, or mortality in individuals on mechanical ventilation. The findings of this study can be valuable for guiding evidence-based clinical practice and developing a therapeutic approach that provides real benefits for this population.

Development of a Prediction Score for Evaluation of Extubation Readiness in Neurosurgical Patients with Mechanical Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: There is no widely accepted consensus on the weaning and extubating protocols for neurosurgical patients, leading to heterogeneity in clinical practices and high rates of delayed extubation and extubation failure-related health complications. METHODS: In this single-center prospective observational diagnostic study, mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients with extubation attempts were consecutively enrolled for 1 yr. Responsive physicians were surveyed for the reasons for delayed extubation and developed the Swallowing, Tongue protrusion, Airway protection reflected by spontaneous and suctioning cough, and Glasgow Coma Scale Evaluation (STAGE) score to predict the extubation success for neurosurgical patients already meeting other general extubation criteria. RESULTS: A total of 3,171 patients were screened consecutively, and 226 patients were enrolled in this study. The rates of delayed extubation and extubation failure were 25% (57 of 226) and 19% (43 of 226), respectively. The most common reasons for the extubation delay were weak airway-protecting function and poor consciousness. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the total STAGE score associated with extubation success was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.79). Guided by the highest Youden index, the cutoff point for the STAGE score was set at 6 with 59% (95% CI, 51 to 66%) sensitivity, 74% (95% CI, 59 to 86%) specificity, 90% (95% CI, 84 to 95%) positive predictive value, and 30% (95% CI, 21 to 39%) negative predictive value. At STAGE scores of 9 or higher, the model exhibited a 100% (95% CI, 90 to 100%) specificity and 100% (95% CI, 72 to 100%) positive predictive value for predicting extubation success. CONCLUSIONS: After a survey of the reasons for delayed extubation, the STAGE scoring system was developed to better predict the extubation success rate. This scoring system has promising potential in predicting extubation readiness and may help clinicians avoid delayed extubation and failed extubation-related health complications in neurosurgical patients.

Development and validation of a prediction model for evaluating extubation readiness in preterm infants.

Successful early extubation has advantages not only in terms of short-term respiratory morbidities and survival but also in terms of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal protocol or guidelines for extubation readiness in preterm infants. Therefore, the decision to extubate preterm infants was almost entirely at the attending physician's discretion. We identified robust and quantitative predictors of success or failure of the first planned extubation attempt before 36 weeks of post-menstrual age in preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age) and developed a prediction model for evaluating extubation readiness using these predictors. Extubation success was defined as the absence of reintubation within 72 h after extubation. This observational cohort study used data from preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital in South Korea between July 2003 and June 2019 to identify predictors and develop and test a predictive model for extubation readiness. Data from preterm infants included in the Medical Informative Medicine for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database between 2001 and 2008 were used for external validation. From a machine learning model using predictors such as demographics, periodic vital signs, ventilator settings, and respiratory indices, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and average precision of our model were 0.805 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802-0.809) and 0.917, respectively in the internal validation and 0.715 (95% CI, 0.713-0.717) and 0.838, respectively in the external validation. Our prediction model (NExt-Predictor) demonstrated high performance in assessing extubation readiness in both internal and external validations.

Efficacy and safety of Cook staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cook Stage extubation is a tool developed by Cook Medical for patients with difficult airways. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of Cook Stage extubation Set (CSES). Currently, no systematic review evidence has been published in this field. Therefore, this study aimed to review the clinical success rate, safety, and tolerability of CSES in patients with difficult airways. METHOD: The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included difficult airway and CSES. The primary outcome was the CSES clinical success rate.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Series were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. R studio, version 4.2.2. was used to perform the statistical analysis. The Cochrane Q and I2 statistics were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Details of the included case reports were summarized in the systematic review part. RESULTS: Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, and 7 case reports were included for systematic review. The pooled overall CSES clinical success rate was 93% (95% CI: 85%, 97%). The CSES intolerable and complication incidence rates were 9% (95% CI: 5%, 18%) and 5% (95% CI: 2%, 12%), respectively. CSES clinical success rate was influenced by the study center and study design. The success rate of CSES was higher in multicenter and prospective design studies. Seven case reports have documented the successful operation of CSES intubation in obese, tall, oncologist, and pediatric patients. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis suggested that CSES have achieved a high clinical success rate in adult and pediatric patients with different physical conditions and types of surgery. The results of all original studies and meta-analysis confirmed a remarkably high tolerance rate and low overall complication rate. However, regardless of the tools chosen, a personalized, safe intubation strategy and a highly qualified anesthesiologist should be considered as the fundamental guarantee of a high clinical success rate. Future studies should also focus on the success rate of reintubation using CSES in patients with airway difficulties.

Static Respiratory System Compliance as a Predictor of Extubation Failure in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.

PURPOSE: Ventilator weaning protocols rely in part on objective indices to best predict extubation failure in the critically ill. We investigated static respiratory system compliance (RC) as a predictor of extubation failure, in comparison to extubation readiness using rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multi-institutional study of mechanically ventilated patients admitted between 12/01/2017 and 12/01/2019. All patients older than 18 years with a documented spontaneous breathing trial and extubation trial were included. RC and RSBI were calculated prior to the extubation trial. The primary outcome was extubation failure-defined as need for reintubation within 72 h from time of extubation. RESULTS: Of the 2263 patients, 55.8% were males with a mean age of 68 years. The population consisted mostly of Caucasians (73%) and African Americans (20.4%). 274 (12.1%) patients required reintubation within 72 h. On multivariate logistic regression after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, number of ventilator days, and the P/F ratio on the day of extubation, RC remained the strongest predictor for extubation failure at 24 h (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.00-2.10) and 72 h (aOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.15-2.17). There was no significant association between RSBI and extubation failure at 24 (aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01) or at 72 h (aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01). CONCLUSION: RC measured on the day of extubation is a promising physiological discriminant to potentially risk stratify patients with acute respiratory failure for extubation readiness. We recommend further validation studies in prospective cohorts.

Work of Breathing During Proportional Assist Ventilation as a Predictor of Extubation Failure.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on predictors of extubation success, use of ventilatory support after extubation is common and 10-20% of patients require re-intubation. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) mode automatically calculates estimated total work of breathing (total WOB). Here, we assessed the performance of total WOB to predict extubation failure in invasively ventilated subjects. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in 6 adult ICUs at an academic medical center. We enrolled intubated subjects who successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial, had a rapid shallow breathing index < 105 breaths/min/L, and were deemed ready for extubation by the primary team. Total WOB values were recorded at the end of a 30-min PAV trial. Extubation failure was defined as any respiratory support and/or re-intubation within 72 h of extubation. We compared total WOB scores between groups and performance of total WOB for predicting extubation failure with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Of 61 subjects enrolled, 9.8% (n = 6) required re-intubation, and 50.8% (n = 31) required any respiratory support within 72 h of extubation. Median total WOB at 30 min on PAV was 0.9 J/L (interquartile range 0.7-1.3 J/L). Total WOB was significantly different between subjects who failed or were successfully extubated (median 1.1 J/L vs 0.7 J/L, P = .004). The area under the curve was 0.71 [95% CI 0.58-0.85] for predicting any requirement of respiratory support and 0.85 [95% CI 0.69-1.00] for predicting re-intubation alone within 72 h of extubation. Total WOB cutoff values maximizing sensitivity and specificity equally were 1.0 J/L for any respiratory support (positive predictive value [PPV] 70.0%, negative predictive value [NPV] 67.7%) and 1.3 J/L for re-intubation (PPV 26.3%, NPV 97.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The discriminative performance of a PAV-derived total WOB value to predict extubation failure was good, indicating total WOB may represent an adjunctive tool for assessing extubation readiness. However, these results should be interpreted as preliminary, with specific thresholds of PAV-derived total WOB requiring further investigation in a large multi-center study.

Ultra-fast track extubation protocol following cardiovascular surgery: Predictors of failure and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Identifying independent predictor factors of failure of ultra-fast track (UFT) extubation and to compare in-hospital outcomes with UFT extubation versus fast track (FT) extubation after cardiovascular surgery in adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1498 consecutive patients aged over 18 years-old undergoing cardiovascular surgery at a single institution. Between December 2014 and December 2016, FT extubation was used (N = 713) while, between December 2016 and December 2018, all patients were preoperatively considered suitable for UFT extubation (N = 785). In this instance, a standardized anaesthetic protocol was applied in all cases. The decision to not extubate in the operating room (OR) was based on intraoperative haemodynamic and ventilation. RESULTS: Extubation in the OR was possible in 699 (89%) patients. Significant independent predictors factors of UFT extubation failure were: preoperative NYHA class III-IV, myocardial infarction within two days prior to surgery, preoperative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, urgent/emergent surgery, intraoperative transfusion of platelets and intraoperative inotropic and vasopressor support. UFT extubation was associated with lower rates of cardiovascular complications such as congestive cardiac insufficiency (OR: 1,57; 95% CI: 1,13-2,19; p = 0,008) and new-onset postoperatory atrial fibrillation (OR: 1,40; 95% CI: 1,06-1,86; p = 0,020). Patient extubated in the OR presented lower risk of overall complications, shorter intensive care unit stay and higher short-term survival, although, no statistically significance was found when performing the multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A routine immediate extubation in the OR following adult cardiovascular surgery is a feasible and safe practice, associated with low cardiovascular morbidity.